Monday, September 06, 2010
   
Text Size

Site Search powered by Ajax

Latest

Help End Marijuana Prohibition

A new Irish website, still in its early days, is dedicated to helping end cannabis prohibition, especially medical cannabis. It has a healthy dose of valuable and endless information. Check it out

 

 http://hempirl.webs.com/

 

Legal Cannabis in California?

 

 

 

                                                  

 

The Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010

 

This is the outcome of a long-term campaign fought by cannabis advisory groups, lawyers, law enforcement policy-makers, doctors, teachers, students etc. It would see a dramatic shift from the 'Devils Weed' days, to modern America. 

The passing of the Act will ''allow people 21 years old or older to possess, cultivate, or transport marijuana for personal use. Permits local governments to regulate and tax commercial production and sale of marijuana to people 21 years old or older. Prohibits people from possessing marijuana on school grounds, using it in public, smoking it while minors are present, or providing it to anyone under 21 years old. Maintains current prohibitions against driving while impaired. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Savings of up to several tens of millions of dollars annually to state and local governments on the costs of incarcerating and supervising certain marijuana offenders. Unknown but potentially major tax, fee, and benefit assessment revenues to state and local government related to the production and sale of marijuana products.

California, lead the way... 

 

SEE MORE HERE -  http://www.taxcannabis.org/index.php/pages/initiative/

 

California is the place!!!!

September 28, 2009

California dreaming of full marijuana legalisation

The smell gives the game away. A sweet herbal scent wafts from the medicines inside the smart display cases in the Harborside clinic in Oakland, California.

This is a marijuana dispensary, where the prescriptions have names like Super Silver Haze and Purple Trainwreck and customers need a “recommendation note” from a doctor.

Medical marijuana has become big business in California and the drug is approved for a range of conditions and for “any other illness for which marijuana provides relief”. In these straitened financial times, booming sales and healthy tax revenues mean that full legalisation of cannabis may be just around the corner.

The Harborside Health Centre — opened by Stephen DeAngelo, 51, in 2006 — alone employs 77 people, has 30,000 registered patients and brings in about $20 million (£12.4 million) annually in revenue.

Across California there are an estimated 2,100 dispensaries, co-operatives, wellness clinics and taxi delivery services in the sector known as “cannabusiness”. That is more than all the Starbucks, McDonald’s and 7-Eleven outlets in the state put together.

These dispensaries, with names like My Green Heaven Ministry, sell marijuana in bud and resin forms and offer other cannabis products, including hash cookies, cooking oils and bottled drinks.

In some high-end stores, there are pastry chefs to ensure the highest-quality cannabis baked goods. Most cannabis co-operatives, which produce their own plants, also sell potted plants and seeds for patients to grow their own medicine.

“People are choosing to become legal cannabis consumers because they don’t want to go out on the corners and deal with thugs and gangsters to get their medicine,” Mr DeAngelo told The Times.

Activists and business owners at last week’s annual conference of the National Organisation for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) in San Francisco are feeling more optimistic about the future of dope in America than they have for years — because they have economics on their side.

The recession has made the prospect of collecting taxes on marijuana sales as tempting as ending Prohibition was in the 1930s to many politicians.

Legalisation might bring state and federal governments about $7 billion annually in additional tax revenue, while saving them $13.5 billion in law enforcement costs, Jeffrey Miron, the Harvard economist, estimates.

In California Arnold Schwarzenegger, the Governor, who has had to cut services to handle a $24 billion budget deficit for the coming year, has suggested that legalisation should be considered.

Tom Ammiano, a Democrat California assemblyman from San Francisco, has introduced a Bill to treat marijuana like alcohol, taxing sales to adults while barring possession by anyone under 21. He estimates that this would generate up to $1.3 billion in revenues. There is also a voter initiative to put legalisation on a ballot in elections next year.

Many, such as Mr DeAngelo, see medical marijuana as the route to full legalisation. More than 70 per cent of Americans favour the use of medical cannabis. Allen St Pierre, executive director of NORML, said: “The vanguard of reform is medical access. The Baby Boomer generation grew up with marijuana and now have the reins of power. Every measurable metric is swinging our way.”

Already, dozens of dispensaries are opening in states from Oregon to Colorado to Rhode Island. Thirteen states have laws that allow patients to use marijuana, typically to alleviate chronic pain, deal with the effects of chemotherapy or even as an appetite stimulant. Fifteen states are considering similar legislation in the coming year.

Proposals by Mr DeAngelo — who uses marijuana to relieve pain from a degenerative disease — for Oakland’s four cannabis dispensaries to pay an extra sales duty have been adopted, making it the first place in America that collects a specific cannabis tax.

Mr DeAngelo estimates that the authorities will receive an extra $1 million next year. California required dispensaries to pay sales tax only in 2007. Conservative estimates put gross statewide medical cannabis sales at about $2.5 billion, generating taxes of about $220 million.

All this has occurred under a federal regime that still outlaws medical cannabis. Officially, the US Government has banned cannabis sales since the 1930s, but over the past decade or so the federal authorities have scaled down punitive action. In late February, Eric Holder, the Attorney-General, confirmed that federal raids and prosecutions would no longer be carried out against anyone complying with state medical marijuana laws.

Today California has up to 400,000 medical marijuana patients. About 600 came to Harborside for the drug each day, Mr DeAngelo said.

“It is good for insomnia, stress, anxiety and chronic pain.” And for the economy, he could have added.

Potted history

• Marijuana was used medicinally in the ancient world and has been in use in Eastern cultures for thousands of years. It was introduced to Western medicine by William Brooke O’Shaughnessy, an Irish physician, who conducted a cannabis experiment in 1830 while at the Medical College of Calcutta

• Cannabis was sold in the form of a powder or tincture early in the 20th century, but, as concern grew over its associations with crime and psychosis, it was steadily outlawed, then banned altogether by the US Government in 1937

• Some doctors object to the use of cannabis as a medicinal remedy because its effects can be unpredictable. Most pharmaceuticals are formed from a purified chemical compound. In contrast, marijuana, which usually consists of the dried, ground-up flowers of a plant, contains at least 400 compounds, including more than 60 cannabinoids, which have therapeutic effects. The proportions of these compounds vary greatly from plant to plant, and smoking — which allows cannabis to enter the bloodstream faster than ingesting the drug — seems to many to be an undesirable way to deliver medicine to sick patients

• There are pharmaceutical forms of cannabis on the market and companies are pursuing more reliable commercial chemical variants

• The US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has ruled that there is no scientific justification for the medical use of marijuana. According to the DEA: “Legalisation of marijuana, no matter how it begins, will come at the expense of our children and public safety. It will create dependency and treatment issues, and open the door to use of other drugs, impaired health, delinquent behaviour and drugged drivers.” Despite this, the latest federal survey indicates that more than 100 million Americans have tried the drug at some point

   
 

Idiotic ‘war’ strategy

Idiotic ‘war’ strategy is only playing into the hands of the drug baronsBy Ryle DwyerSaturday, August 08, 2009SURELY the worst kind of stupidity is the failure to learn from mistakes. Yet we persist in making the same ones. Albert Einstein’s definition of insanity was "doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results".The Global Illicit Drug Markets Report 1998 to 2007 was highlighted during the week. It concluded that the war on drugs has not reduced production, trafficking, availability or the use of illicit drugs. This huge study was conducted on behalf of the European Commission.

While the use of illicit drugs has not gone down, the price of those drugs has fallen between 10% and 30% in western Europe. This is a sure indication that the availability of those drugs is greater than ever, despite more severe penalties.

Western society is clearly losing the fight against illicit drugs. "There is no evidence that drugs have become more difficult to obtain," the report concluded. "Cannabis use has become a ‘normal’ part of young people’s lives in many western countries." The report suggested that up to half of the people born after 1980 have at least tried cannabis.

The cost of living may have rocketed during the decade up to the beginning of last year, but the cost of drugs came down. Of the 31 countries surveyed, there were only two where cannabis was cheaper than Ireland — Mexico, which is one of the main producers, and Portugal.

Only a fool would suggest the Americans are winning the war on drugs and only a bigger fool would advocate that we should emulate their tactics, but this is exactly what we have been doing.

"The United States has had the same kind of drug problems for the past quarter of a century," I wrote here in one of my first columns in April 1995. "It has spent billions of dollars on drug enforcement, but this has just been throwing good money after bad. Things are as bad now as they have ever been. We do not have that kind of money, but even if we did, it is pointless to adopt methods that have failed so dismally elsewhere. If our leaders persist in making the same mistakes they will deserve nothing but contempt."

Things here are even worse now and the recent report concluded that the more severe penalties are not improving matters. Would things be better if they made possession of cannabis punishable by long prison terms? I sincerely doubt it.

While I was at university in Texas in the late 1960s and early 1970s the penalty for possession of any amount of marijuana, or cannabis as it is more commonly called here, was from two years to life in prison. Yet a survey conducted at the university found that 80% of the senior class smoked marijuana.

Some months after the release of that survey there was a sensation when 95 federal agents dropped out of the university. They had been brought in undercover to investigate the drug scene in the guise of students.

It was an enormous waste of resources. Shortly afterwards the US Supreme Court ruled the Texas drug law unconstitutional after a Houston court sentenced a black man to 35 years in jail for possession of less than an ounce of the marijuana for personal use. The punishment was grossly disproportionate to the crime.

In a series of radio interviews in this country in 2006, Gerry Cameron, a former American police chief with 17 years’ experience in drug enforcement, described the current war on drugs a complete failure.

"We’ll spend $69 billion in the United States this year," he said. "We’ll arrest over a million and a half people for drugs this year in the United States. Approximately little over half of that will be for marijuana and approximately 80% of that will be charged with simple possession."

Tremendous police resources are being diverted into putting people in jail who have never done a violent act towards anybody or their property.

People have not been facing up to the reality of the drug problem. A great many people deplore drugs while they are standing with a drink or a cigarette. They clearly do not realise that tobacco and alcohol are both much more harmful drugs than cannabis, which is "a rather benign substance by comparison," according to Cameron. Hence cannabis and narcotics should be treated differently.

Nobody with even a modicum of intelligence would now suggest the sale of alcohol and tobacco should be banned. They tried alcohol prohibition in the US and they ended up generating much the same problems that are now being generated with the war on drugs. We have violence in the streets, drive-by shootings and gang warfare in our cities, and it has already spread to provincial towns. We have developed all the sordid aspects of life associated with the golden era of the American gangster during prohibition.

When the sale of alcohol was again legalised in the USA in the 1930s, the social decay that some predicted never happened. Prohibition on other drugs has proved just as disastrous in fostering dangerous criminal activity.

The recent report concluded that the current drug prohibition has inflicted "substantial harm" by creating lucrative black markets and worsening levels of violence. "We have continued to do the same thing," Cameron argued in 2006. "I believe that this is because we have created a symbiotic relationship between the dealers and the bureaucracy. The dealers need us in the police to keep their competition down and their profits up, and the bureaucracy needs the drug traffickers to have a reason to exist."

If we were able to cut the whole drug supply into the country tomorrow, have people considered what would likely happen? Drug addicts would go frantic to get what drugs were still available within the country. The price would soar and addicts would become desperate and would feel compelled to steal more. More innocent people than ever would become vulnerable to these desperate people.

A REAL remedy would be to take the profit out of drugs and get the addicts out of the clutches of the pushers both by recognising that addicts are ill and by providing them with the necessary drug under controlled conditions, just as a diabetic is allowed to buy insulin.

A diabetic becomes addicted to insulin, which he or she gets on prescription. Addicts of other drugs should be permitted to purchase those drugs on prescription from authorised outlets.

Since addicts would be legally able to get their drugs cheaper, this would knock the dealers out of business because they could not sell them at extortionist prices. It would also eliminate the monetary incentive for drug dealers to get anybody hooked on drugs.

Millions of euro change hands in the illegal drug trade and this will inevitably lead to the corruption of our law enforcement. There are bad eggs in every walk of life. We know of the massive garda corruption in Donegal and the Morris tribunal has concluded that the problems are not limited to there.

Yet we are inviting corruption by blissfully persisting with an idiotic drug strategy.

Using tried and tested tactics that have failed so dramatically is a cause of, and not the answer, to our problems.
This story appeared in the printed version of the Irish Examiner Saturday, August 08, 2009



Read more: http://www.examiner.ie/opinion/columnists/ryle-dwyer/idiotic-war-strategy-is-only-playing-into-the-hands-of-the-drug-barons-98240.html#mon#ixzz0NauavSfp

 

   

Page 1 of 2

Login Form